A bit of housekeeping..

Comments Off on A bit of housekeeping..

The beer I am going to evaluate in the very next post puts a cap on a string of beers lately that have me at a dilema, or maybe crossroads is a better term.

I see the need to once and for all address and lay down the procedure I use for the evaluations/reviews I post here on this blog. I also see the need to start adding some of my own personal observations of procedure when needed.

To be clear, I don’t want this to turn into a “how to fix this beer” blog, but there has been a few occasions where some extra commentary would have been helpful in explaining my evaluation a beer.

When I evaluate/review a beer I take into account two things.

First: What the brewer or company is telling me the beer is.

If they are telling me it is a sweet stout, I will start looking at how it fares as a sweet stout by using guidelines like the BJCP or The Brewers Association beer styles.

I generally assess how the beers fit into the style that it is being marketed as.

I say “generally” because these are not competition beers. These are beers made to appeal to a wide range of tastes. Beer style guidelines have fairly narrow specs that contest beers follow.
But the we, the consumer, need to have some sort of an idea of what to expect, so the brewer or company gives us the style it is or closely matches.

Second of course, is how I like it. How I personally rank the different aspects of the beer.

Those two things are usually pretty close together and don’t usually need to be separated. I then combine or fold that info into my Untappd score.

However, in light of recent beers, and especially the next beer I post,, there needs to be a clear seperation of style score, and my personal taste score.

Why? Because to me Untappd is about how I enjoy the beer or not, rather than how it is technically. I have been factoring in both since the beginning, but recently I have been needing to draw a faint line to show that separation.

I don’t wanna hear the “whether you like it or not is all that matters” argument either.. because that is completely false.

None the less, that is what Untappd is all about, but luckily that is NOT what these evals/reviews or this blog in general is about.

By adding and explaining things from my own brewing and drinking experiences I think I can tighten the gap between the two scores, and maybe explain how or why we got there, or possibly why a beer was placed in the category it was.

I do not think there will be much change in how things are presented, but now at least you will know how I got the scores I give, and hopefully you will get a little more info on the beers we love.

Thanks, and stay tuned.
All roast, all the time.

Patagonia Porter — 9stripe Brewery

Leave a comment

I won a pound of this Perla Negra roast grain a few weeks back so I figured I’d use it all in one blast to see what we get out of it. All of the descriptions I’ve seen on it seem to make it out to be a “softer” roast. One of the huskless roasts, […]

via Patagonia Porter — 9stripe Brewery

Old post yes, but wanted to check out how well importing from my homebrew site goes.

Good City Porter

Leave a comment

I was out picking up a 6 pack of something for the Friday, and I was shocked at how hard it is now days to find just a regular beer. I don’t want raspberry this or coconut that. Just a beer please.

It took a while, but I found this Goodcity Brewing’s Detail Porter.

goodcity

For something that’s named Detail,, there arn’t many details about it. Its a 5.4% porter style in a can. That’s all of the info there is. Ok, lets drink this.

Cracking open the can I was a bit surprised at almost no action. In fact, I was a bit worried, but when actually pouring the beer into my glass it was quite lively. Not exactly a cascade but definite carbonation bubbling and forming a light tan head on the very dark brown body.

The Dark roast aroma is not heavy, but in good amounts. I would say more of the black malts than roasted barley. Then right behind comes light chocolate. But not a sweet chocolate, more like a grainy brownie chocolate. If you search hard enough you can just pick out the faintest of faint hop,, but its nearly hidden.

Going in for the first taste. Much different than the aromas. Much more up front roast here. Then chocolate is much further behind it, but there is an instant coffee crystals thing now. And it fits nicely. More hops in the flavor as well, but not of the citrusy or piney varieties. More like Goldings or such. Nothing in the way of a yeast though, so would assume an American strain. Good stuff here.

The body is lighter, but still in the medium range. With the standard carbonation, the bittering is noticeable, but minimal… but perfect level this beer.

If I was going to make a porter right now, this is pretty close to what I would be looking for. Simple. But having just enough of everything, and not having to need a gimmick to be good.

I’m going to go grab another of this Detail Porter. 3.75/5

Older Entries Newer Entries